An attorney and her husband who breached a agreement to buy a residence in Alexandria, when they made a decision to transfer to Texas so spouse could accept an in-residence counsel place, are responsible for damages for the difference of their contract value and your home’s ultimate sale price tag, vendor’s brokerage service fees and commission and utility and enhancement costs, although not for funds gains taxes the seller compensated when she marketed IBM stock so she could invest in home in Florida after the 1st sale in Virginia fell via, says an Alexandria U.S. District Court docket magistrate choose.
While plaintiff had a contract with a software corporation to market its application and negotiate a deal with Freddie Mac to replace the company’s high-quality Handle application, Freddie Mac preferred a three-occasion connection, and its supreme choice to type a agreement only with the software program enterprise didn't breach an agency contract with plaintiff promoting company; the Alexandria U.
S. District Court states the alleged incidents tend not to assist a hostile natural environment declare and plaintiff has no proof to rebut the employer’s proffered cause of termination – his unexcused absences.
S. District Courtroom grants defendants’ motion in limine to exclude plaintiffs’ proffered authorities and grants summary judgment to defendants.
Even though determined resources could only say a married few experienced developed substantial amounts of cannabis on their property in past times and a single source experienced ordered cannabis from wife at some unidentified earlier time, police confirmed more information during the affidavit, like the pair’s high use of energy, along with the 4th Circuit upholds a thermal-imaging search that led to the seizure of cannabis over the couple’s West Virginia assets.
A homeowner who received a default judgment in opposition to a contractor who recognized $35,000 to construct an addition to her house only to own him dig a trench, pour footings and after that abandon the job, wins reconsideration moved here of her declare by the Board for Contractors; the Norfolk Circuit Court states the board erred by not taking into consideration every one of the evidence from your two informal point-getting conferences, such as the proprietor’s testimony.
Irrespective of proof that a medical professional who offered cure to claimant lowered expenses for solutions to Medicare patients and below a Longshore Payment Schedule, the Court docket of Appeals suggests employer didn't meet its load to indicate the bigger payment charged by the company exceeded the “prevailing price” in the Group for that company, and the buy requiring employer to pay the total fee is affirmed.
An injured seaman who filed Jones Act and unseaworthiness promises in condition court docket, then nonsuited, remains sure from the 3-yr limitations time period for these types of promises; the Norfolk Circuit Courtroom states these claims are time-barred, since the Condition Cost savings Statute did not increase the federal constraints period of time plus the 3-calendar year interval wasn't equitably tolled.
S. District Court docket reserves for jury trial the level of damages plaintiff may Recuperate, and states he is also suitable for legal professional’s expenses.
S. District Court suggests; ERISA’s anti-alienation and assignment provision bars the government from trying to find prison forfeiture of defendant’s desire valued at $82,253, although the court docket says other treatments could be out there.
During this Norfolk Circuit Court docket litigation alleging a wellbeing club own trainer pursued a club member’s wife for a intimate relationship plus the spouse retaliated with complaints on the club and faculty in which the trainer worked as well as couple’s youngster attended, the partner wins summary judgment in the personal trainer’s counterclaims for defamation and tortious interference with deal and with agreement expectancy.
A plaintiff’s assertion that defendant driver pleaded guilty to the visitors infraction but now contests legal responsibility in this automobile-accident personal harm accommodate has not proven a substantial want to acquire a replica with the transcript or tape of defendant’s job interview with the coverage carrier, as well as the Prince William County Circuit Courtroom denies a movement to compel.
S. District Court claims the owner was entitled to share the architect’s Structure Drawings with the replacement architectural company it employed.
S. District Court docket useful link claims HRSD may possibly invoke the Consent Decree’s pressure majeure provision, however the provision would not bar legal responsibility to the ten temperature-similar and products-linked SSDs at issue here.